ADA Home Page
Licensure | Catalog | Member Directory | Contact  
 
Dental Professionals Your Oral Health The ADA
A to Z Topics
Advocacy
Education
Events
Member Center
Publications and Resources
ADA LIBRARY
ADA PUBLICATIONS
About ADA Publishing
ADA News Today
Advertise in
ADA Publications
Advocacy Publications
Buying Guide
Classifieds
E-Publications/E-mail
Journal of the ADA
Subscribe
Professional Product Review
DENTAL CAREERS AND
JOB LISTINGS
EVIDENCE BASED DENTISTRY
PODCASTS
ADA POLICIES & POSITIONS
STANDARDS
Practice Planning and Protection


ADA News
  Search Online News   Current Print Edition
  Online News by Date   Print Edition Yearly Indexes
  Online News by Department   About ADA News
  ADA News Today RSS Feed     Contact ADA News
  Go to ADA News Today  
 Printable format  E-mail article: 
 Search news: 
Third molar study inconclusive
Cochrane findings are based on three studies
Posted June 7, 2005

By Mark Berthold

Nijmegen, Netherlands — The results of a recent Cochrane review on third molar extraction and late incisor crowding are inconclusive, and should not be misinterpreted to mean that asymptomatic dental patients should not have their third molars removed, says Dr. Domenick T. Zero, chair of the ADA Council on Scientific Affairs.

"Clinicians should make it clear to adult patients with asymptomatic third molars that there is no evidence, one way or another, about the effect on incisor crowding of otherwise removing these molars," says Dr. Zero. "Same to adolescents and parents regarding the impact of surgical removal on the late lower incisor crowding."

The systematic review, "Interventions for Treating Asymptomatic Impacted Wisdom Teeth in Adolescents and Adults," was published April 18 by The Cochrane Collaboration.

The review was intended to analyze the effect of removing wisdom teeth — compared to retaining them — on multiple outcomes, including pericoronitis and infection of bone and surrounding tissues.

However, only three studies were included in the review, and these studies addressed only one outcome: crowding. This led the study's chief author, Dr. Dirk Mettes of Radboud University Medical Centre, to conclude that "no evidence was found to support or refute the routine prophylactic removal of asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth in adults."

"There is some reliable evidence," Dr. Mettes added, which "suggests that the prophylactic removal of asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents neither reduces nor prevents late incisor crowding."

Many reasons other than late incisor crowding may lead a dentist to recommend extracting the third molars, says Dr. Zero. In the decision-making process, dentists and oral surgeons can use this review, along with other related information and their own clinical expertise. "It's also prudent," he says, "that dentists include the preferences of the individual patient."

Further information can be found online at www.ada.org/goto/ebd.

Quick Links
Subscribe to ADA News
Advertise in ADA News
Publishing Division Editorial Policies
Copyright 1995-2009 American Dental Association.
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
See Privacy Policy (Updated 03/14/05) and Terms of Use for further legal information.
Link opens in separate window. Pop-up Blocker may need to be disabled. Link opens in separate window.
Pop-up Blocker may need to be disabled.
Member Only Content Member only content.