“The department was aware of similar fluoridation challenges occurring in Wisconsin that ultimately were favorable towards water fluoridation,” Dr. Russell said. “Dr. Dunkel was consulted on his approach in the public debate.”
A unified and coordinated response was crucial, said Dr. Dunkel, because of the great need of those in Tama and beyond.
“Now, with the devastating effects of COVID-19, gaps or barriers to oral health care have intensified,” Dr. Dunkel said. “With all these barriers to health care, especially for the under-resourced populations, now is definitely not the time to remove a proven safe and cost-effective method for reducing dental decay as this may be their only current access to any dental benefits.”
The city discontinued fluoridation in April in a 3-1 decision, after the area’s water superintendent showed a presentation to the council that included a video from a group of anti-fluoridation activists, Dr. Levy said.
On Oct. 4, the council voted 3-2 to reinstate the practice.
One constant voice leading the charge, Sarah Petersen, community water fluoridation coordinator for the Iowa Department of Public Health, was ecstatic at the council’s decision.
“I knew science and facts would prevail eventually,” she wrote in an email to supporters after the vote.
“It is always an uplifting moment when you are able to get fluoride reintroduced after it has been removed,” Dr. Dunkel said. “Unfortunately, as the saying goes, ‘We may have won the battle, but the war goes on.’ We still have community water fluoridation issues in Madison (Wisconsin) and a host of other cities nationally and globally. The bottom line is that we are making headway through the help from health departments from other states along with private sector stakeholders like the ADA and AFS in turning back these challenges.”
For more information on fluoride and ADA advocacy of community water fluoride, visit ADA.org/fluoride.