ERISA Plans

Federal Laws vs. State Laws

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) regulates self-funded dental plans. Some carriers argue it allows them to ignore state insurance laws meant to protect patients. How does this impact your practice and what should you do about it?

ERISA Plans: Are State Laws Ignored (PDF)

Why does ERISA need to be reformed?
  • ERISA regulates plan administrators and establishes minimum standards for the pensions plan and private industry. The ADA is not advocating to change this.
  • ERISA governs how employers provide benefit plans to employees to protect the interests of workers. The ADA wants to protect these workers too by ensuring that patient protection provisions within dental insurance laws passed in each state are enforced on carriers, whether they are acting as plan administrators or as insurance companies.
  • Since the enactment of ERISA five decades ago, there has been a major shift in insurance plan categories in the U.S. We’ve seen a dramatic increase in “self-funded” plans over “fully insured” plans. The effect of this shift is that carriers administering self-funded plans use their interpretation of ERISA to preempt compliance with state laws, ultimately harming the doctor patient relationship. That’s why it is critical for the ADA to act on this issue.
  • To date, we are aware of more than 360 insurance reform laws specific to dental care that have been enacted by states to protect patients and providers from abusive practices by insurers and third-party administrators. Insurers should not be permitted to choose which laws to follow and which to ignore when states have worked hard to pass them.
  • The ADA wants to ensure that the ERISA preemption is used correctly. The reform we are seeking would not impact retirement plan assets (like 401k or 403b) or pensions.